Talk:History of linguistics
Talk:History of linguistics
 | History of linguistics has been listed as a level-4 vital article in History. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
| WikiProject Linguistics | (Rated Start-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||
Chomsky and linguistic[edit]
what kind of history of linguistics fails to mention Chomsky
-- well, we'll just have to fix it. Other notable omissions include the entire history of linguistic thought outside the Western tradition since the 19th century. Oops! -- mk270
== and Chomsky is just one of linguitical animal?
Unsupported claim[edit]
The section on Historical linguistics stated:
- However, the existence of any such single ancestral language on timescales indicated by a literal reading of the Bible is not consistent with modern linguistics.
Since no reference, scholarly or otherwise, was given, I've deleted it. Claims of this sort, while plausible, are hard to demonstrate, so I consider it dubious. --- Charles Stewart 18:22, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
History of communication[edit]
I have expanded this article, but I am not a linguistic expert, so I am not sure how to connect it to linguistic - perhaps some of you may want to look at it and consider this.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 18:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Odd sentence[edit]
In Antiquity/India: "Subsequently, a wider body of work influenced Sanskrit scholars such as Ferdinand de Saussure, Leonard Bloomfield, and Roman Jakobson and Frits Staal[2] discuss the possible European impact of Indian ideas on language." Is there a linguistics historian here who knows what that should say? --Milkbreath (talk) 04:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
, who discuss the possible impact Indian pre-modern linguistic ideas had on the development of European linguistics?
It's an odd sentence in still yet another awful article on linguistics at wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.7.7.20 (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Circular referencing[edit]
History of linguistics states that further information is contained at History of grammar. History of grammar states that further information is contained at History of linguistics. The references should be hierarchical. As History of grammar is a sub-section of Grammar it would seem logical that the more detailed information (the "further informmation") should be here at History of linguistics. The two need to be co-ordinated. LookingGlass (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of linguistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080426224511/http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/books/readT.html to http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/books/readT.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Comments
Post a Comment