User talk:Gdarin
User talk:Gdarin
Hello there Gdarin, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. Alex756 09:01, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:49, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing[edit]
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Wikipedia:Polish Wikipedians' notice board[edit]
Hi! You may be interested in checking our noticeboard. Welcome!--SylwiaS 16:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
popular names format[edit]
Hi:) I see you have made the Basque Country and Catalonia subsections of Spain. Could you do the same for the United Kingdom please if you have time? My tech skills are not up to it, I'm afraid. Thanks 20 (?) United Kingdom 20.1 England and Wales 20.2 Northern Ireland 20.3 Scotland Jameswilson 23:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Yellow there! Good to see someone doing a bit of tidying up but could you please not get rid of updated info. This is an encylcopaedia so content before design!
A bit of advice, be carefull when dealing with places like the Basque country and Northern Ireland. Even though I don't mind Jameswilson's idea, some people from Scotland and Ireland might not. Afn 11:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Bel-Wiki[edit]
Please, read the explanations of needs in Bel-Wiki on: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages#Belarusian_.28Orthography_Revision_of_1959.29_.2819_support_.2F_13_oppose.29 and take off your vote. It's just unargumented. I think that Belarusians WANT (and should) to write in THEIR NATIVE LANGUAGE (that they study at schools and universities!..) Thanks for attantion. Thanks for understanding. BooXteR
[edit]
|
.svg)
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Gdarin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 1,690 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Aneta Kręglicka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Malbork Castle[edit]
Hi. See Talk:Malbork_Castle#World.27s_largest: your original definition "the largest heap of bricks north of the Alps" has been removed. --Nemo 13:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Blokada[edit]
Możesz nie odblokować, bo 3 dni to dużo za coś co było w nerwach. Przepraszam Lispir word is power 08:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- Co poradzie jak byłem nauczony żeby nie kłamać i mówić co myślę, a ja też muszę uważać bo stracę czas na zbędne dyskusje DNU na moją pracą jaką sobie dorobiłem przez wikigrant i hasło z IO:} Lispir word is power 10:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- A znasz co takiego jak wyładowanie emocji po przez wulgaryzmy jakoś nie widzie moich zdania abym wyzywał Bukaja czy innych. Uważam że zgłoszenie to nagonka na polaków, jakoś nikt nie rusza innych. A wielu jeszcze czeka napisania np. jak Dino Toso, Dirk de Beer, Antonia Terzi lub uzupełnienia już napisanych(przeważnie medialnych) Loïc Bigois, James Allison itd. To praca na kilka godzin tylko miesięcy jak by nad nimi się skupić. Dwa lata temu już Marcin Budkowski w McLarenie był liderem projektów aero. jak i zastępcą szefa działu aerodynamiki czyli miał wpływ na to jak wygląda bolid zespołu. Jak polskie radio z nim rozmawiało, której od 12 do 13:30 dość dużo mówi o że był za projekt aero tego rocznego modelu. Lispir word is power 19:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- A odwal się ode mnie raz na zawsze, ja o od trzebię chcę nie proszę. Lispir word is power 18:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Chyba przez ze mnie wypiąłeś się na Wikipedię. Może ja nie dobry trzymaniu nerwów ale dobie. Nie przy stoi byciu złym na świat, bo masz funkcje która zobowiązuje. Trzymanie nerwów na wodzy. Przepraszam ze sam nie umiem trzymać nerwów na wodzy, bo jestem informatykiem który zna etykietę bardzo dobrze. Ale mam naturę polaka, do które nie wolność iść komentarzem ze coś jest źle z typowym argumentem nie będącym trafionym. Wracaj bo jesteś bardzo dobry wikipedystą na którym trochu ja się wzorowałem. Lispir word is power 13:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Blokada[edit]
Nedops sam poprawił swój tekst [1]. Wcześniej to była bzdura, nie mająca pokrycia w faktach. Po tej poprawce, ukrytej w historii, mogłeś potraktować to jak atak osobisty. Nie moja wina, że Nedops nie zaznaczył zmiany swojej wypowiedzi, na którą już wcześniej odpowiedziałem. Gasikot (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Ty, a czytałeś to zdanie Administratorzy nie mogą nakładać blokad celem przeforsowania swojej opinii w dyskusji ani w sporze.? Gasikot (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open![edit]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello, Gdarin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
| Hello, Gdarin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Ban[edit]
Dzień dobry!
Szukałem miejsca, żeby się skontaktować. Na szczęście istnieją inne wersje językowe. Więc przechodząc do setna. Proszę wyjaśnij, czemu dałeś mi bana. Bo żadnych wygłupów (taki był niby powód), nie robiłem. A to, co robiłem w brudnopisie. W brudnopisie wszystko wolno, bo tego nie widać. To jest brudnopis. Chciałem sobie poeksperymentować trochę z nazwą. I się udało. Po za tym nie dostałem komunikatu, że coś złego robię. Mogłeś po prostu powiedzieć, o co ci chodzi, i jakoś by się to wyjaśniło. Po za tym długość bana. Jak musiałeś mi dać tego bana to mogłeś dać go tymczasowego, np. na tydzień, a nie na zawsze.
P.S Pisze po polsku, bo tak. Ja umiem po Polsku, ty umiesz po Polsku, więc się dogadamy.
P.P.S Mogłeś przynajmniej dać mi możliwość jakoś się wytłumaczyć i zostawić mi możliwość edycji dyskusji.
P.P.P.S Widzę, że nie jestem pierwszy, który się w ten sposób kontaktuje.
TheTNT1500 (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Dziękuje. Przerzucę wygłupy w brudnopisie na własną eksperymentalną Wikię. Tam nikt nie będzie musiał patrzyć. Brudnopis na Wikipedii zostawię na ważniejsze sprawy. TheTNT1500 (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Not Hoax[edit]
Indeed. See my recent talk comment there (the theory was not AFAIK challenged unto 2007, so when it was added to Wikipedia it was not a hoax). I mentioned this long ago at Wikipedia_talk:List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia#Is_Warsaw_number_a_hoax?. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Comments
Post a Comment