Talk:Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference
Talk:Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference
WikiProject Politics | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WikiProject China | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi, this part is simply not true and is not supported by the article it cites: "Previously dominated by senior figures in real-estate, state-owned enterprises, and "princelings", the CPPCC in 2018 was primarily composed of individuals from China's technology sector.[10]. Can someone review and change?
Explanation[edit]
I've some question which I want to have your explanation! Please help me!
-"Since then, the CPPCC has not been formally included in the PRC Constitution."
It means that,at the presence,there's not any provision which concerns with or indicate to not only the presence but also the political role of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference?Is that right?
-Among the leaders of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference,there're how many members of the Central Committee?
-Who is the current leader of the United Front of RPC?
Can anyone help me? Thanks, --Redflowers 05:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, CPPCC can only issue Non-binding resolution, "suggestions" to the National People's Congress.
- Not sure. (My guess is not that many since - most of the memebers of the CPPCC is non-citizen, non-party member.)
- The current director of United Front of PRC is Du Qinglin. (杜青林)
- Hope it helps.TheAsianGURU (talk) 00:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Li Xiannian.jpg[edit]
The image File:Li Xiannian.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130302121907/http://gbtimes.com/third-angle/chinas-new-government to http://gbtimes.com/third-angle/chinas-new-government
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130302121907/http://gbtimes.com/third-angle/chinas-new-government to http://gbtimes.com/third-angle/chinas-new-government
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Comments
Post a Comment