This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

(Rated B-class, High-importance)

	v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Business

(Rated B-class, High-importance)

	Business portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Marketing & Advertising

(Rated B-class, High-importance)

	v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

(ATTENTION: Split of this talk page)[edit]

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2014; 2016; 2017;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Much of the discussion on this page was regarding the list of generic and genericized trademarks. That list now has its own page, and the related discussion has been moved to its talk page.

Please don't re-create the list here. The list already exists on the List of generic and genericized trademarks page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ComputerGeezer (talk • contribs) 00:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Whether to split the article was discussed under the section #Split, below on this talk page.
--Jerzy•t 04:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

(Routine talk, i.e. discussion of the accompanying article's content)[edit]

Proposal to change the Title of this Article[edit]

I think the title of this article should be changed to "Genericized Trademarks." If you aks any trademark lawyer (and I'm one of them)m they'll tell you that there is no such thing as a "Generic Trademark" because generic terms cannot ever be trademarks. So, there are "generic terms" and genericized trademarks (i.e., terms that use to be trademarks). Therefore, I believe a title change is appropriate in the interest of accuracy. Cheers, Alpha908 (talk) 17:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

don't say Velcro video[edit]

one of my favorite examples of efforts to combat this phenomenon comes from the legal department of the Velcro company, in which their lawyers did an entire song and dance musical number (not even counting the follow-up video responding to negative feedback they got from Internet trolls) about why genericide of their trademark for hook-and-loop fasteners (which, to be fair, they did invent themselves!) leads to extra work for them. Is there any way some sort of reference to this video could be worked into the corresponding section of article? It's a prime example of the lengths to which a company may go to protect their brand, so I thought it could be useful. It was certainly entertaining to watch, regardless of the motive! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macks2008 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Search This Blog

anhduc wiki 4

Talk:Generic trademark

Talk:Generic trademark

Contents

(ATTENTION: Split of this talk page)[edit]

(Routine talk, i.e. discussion of the accompanying article's content)[edit]

Proposal to change the Title of this Article[edit]

don't say Velcro video[edit]

Navigation menu

Search

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obol (coin)

Jacques Rancière

2000–01 California electricity crisis