Skip to main content

Talk:Hugo Award

Talk:Hugo Award

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleHugo Award has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starHugo Award is the main article in the Hugo Awards series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2011Good article nomineeListed
August 13, 2011Featured topic candidatePromoted
September 24, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Money?[edit]

Is there any actual remuneration that goes with the prize? The Booker Prize, for example, comes with a considerable cash prize. Is there anything comparable with the Hugo?

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 16:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No. Indeed, if you're David Langford you're eventually out of pocket because you need a longer mantlepiece. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Twenty-eight??? Sufferin' gods!
And why have I not heard of him before? Bad fen. No lembas.
*scurries off to the library*
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 20:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do start your Langfording at http://ansible.uk/ as the best source for all your Langfordish needs. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC) (Full disclosure: I've known Langford, a/k/a User:DeafMan for decades; he was one of the nominators for my unsuccessful Trans-Atlantic Fan Fund candidacy.)Reply[reply]

"Works are eligible for an award if they were published in English in the prior calendar year. "[edit]

In this article (and other related articles), there's a statement "Works are eligible for an award if they were published in English in the prior calendar year.", whereas Hugo Award official site states "They can be published anywhere in the world (or out of it), and they can be published in any language." [1]

--Fukumoto (talk) 04:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are correct, this is in error. Fixing now. --PresN 04:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Boilerplate Hugo text[edit]

This article's intro is very clean and tidy, but the same cannot be said for that of the articles for the categories - which each have a slab of boilerplate about the Hugo's in general that's longer than that here. Only then do they mention their actual topic - then followed by another generic slab about the Hugo selection process.

I made a recent edit to Hugo Award for Best Professional Editor (here), which I think improved it, but was reverted because of an apparent convention to begin all awards like this. Can we discuss whether it's OK to clean these up? - Snori (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I've now been a Bit Bold and done this for all award categories. An improvement I think. - Snori (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fargo III-3[edit]

In the third episode of the third season of "Fargo," a "Hugo" is awarded. I suspect that such pop-cultural references are not very common. So I'm surprised it's not mentioned. Greetings from the healthier side of the Atlantic! 2A02:908:F17:B1E0:F88F:20E9:99BA:59C4 (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obol (coin)

Jacques Rancière

2000–01 California electricity crisis